Humanities Homework Help

1. Review the information on the following citizenship cases: Takeo Ozawa v. US (1922); Bhagat Singh Thind v. US (1923) and Easurk Emsen Charr v. Federal District Court (1921). The information on these court cases are in Module 1:

2. Watch Jay Milbrandt and/or Dr. Lori Kornblum’s explanation/examples of the I.R.A.C. Method. (see below for access to links to YouTube video content)

3. While drafting your written response, spend most of your time and energy on the analysis portion of the I.R.A.C. process.

4. The Rule of Law that you will be applying to all 3 citizenship cases is: The Naturalization Law of 1790 (aka Nationality Act of 1790). Information on this is located in Module 1.

5. After you have completed writing your I.R.A.C. analysis, please include a few sentences (2-4) expressing your opinion/insight on the 3 cases.

For your convenience I have included the links to the two basic explanations and examples on the I.R.A.C, Method;

Jay Milbrandt’s Video on Issue, Rule, .Analysis,.Conclusion (I.R.A.C.). Method  (Links to an external site.)TRT: 7;19

Dr. Lori Kornblum: Legal Writing: What is IRAC?  (Links to an external site.)TRT: 2:54

Use this link to access information, if you need advice on how to submit your assignment. The Canvas Student Guide provides instructions for submitting an online Assignment (Links to an external site.).