Article Writing Homework Help

Provide a 9 pages analysis while answering the following question: The Contract between Bruno and Luigi. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. In Bradley v Newsom Sons & Co the Lords came to the conclusion that there had been no abandonment of the ship by the master without any intention of returning to her, and without hope of recovery, so as to entitle the cargo owners to treat the contract as at an end, and to claim possession of the cargo without paying the freight and that the letter of the owners conveyed no intimation of&nbsp.an intention no longer to be bound by the contract. Similarly in Universal Cargo Carriers Corp v Citati the judges held that the&nbsp.charterer, by putting it out of his power to load the cargo within the laytime prescribed, had committed a further breach of the charter party. but that none of the breaches committed were breaches of condition and therefore the&nbsp.owners were not ipso facto entitled to rescind.

Renunciation requires a clear and absolute3 refusal to perform. In the Hermosa that Nitrates should have continued to press for definite information as to the owners and M.T.C.s intentions. and if they had waited they would&nbsp.have realized that they could not have canceled the charter. This renunciation can take the form of conduct indicating that the party is unwilling to perform, even if he is able to perform. The conduct must be such the other party believes that the renouncing party is about to commit a breach. If there is an indication given to a third party of an intention to commit a breach at an unspecified time in the future this would not amount to a renunciation4. Laughton and Hawley v BAPP Industrial Supplies it was held that the industrial tribunal had erred in law in&nbsp.holding that an intention to compete in the future with their employers&nbsp.expressed by the employees in letters to their employers suppliers was&nbsp.in itself a breach of the duty of loyalty owed by the employees to the employers. and that, accordingly, the employers were not justified in&nbsp.dismissing the employees and their dismissals were unfair

Bruno could argue in this case that Luigi should be bound by the terms of the contract. However, had&nbsp.Luigi been aware of the Government ban on the use of genetically modified tomatoes in bottled and canned food products he would not have entered into the contract with Bruno.&nbsp.