Article Writing Homework Help
Hello, I am looking for someone to write an article on Notes from Business Ethics by Crane and Matten. It needs to be at least 2750 words.
Hello, I am looking for someone to write an article on Notes from Business Ethics by Crane and Matten. It needs to be at least 2750 words. Crane and Matten (2010) are critical of the model as they conceive that the model refuses to pay attention to the U.S. context and is thus biased against it. It is also held that where there may be conflicts with two or more responsibilities, there is no clear cut guide on how to deal with the conflict.
Whiles addressing ethical issues and problems, Crane and Matten (2010) argue that there are some crucial levels of reasoning that can be applied (p. 153). The effectiveness of these levels are however dependent on the three-level of moral development possessed by a person and as suggested by Kohlberg. More particularly, the writers emphasize Kohlberg’s Cognitive Moral Development Theories. In all, there are six stages spread through the three levels as depicted below:
Through the application of this model, it is possible to identify the mastery of a company or a business outfit over facing basic ethical issues and problems. From the model, there is the understanding that a business outfit would have greater control over ethical issues and problems, and a commitment to rise above personal interest to face ethical challenges if the business has advanced deeper through the stages of the model. In the real world scenario, a company that is at level 1 will put up an unethical behavior of withholding salaries of employees because the company is running on a deficit. Another company at level 3 will show much urge over ethical pressure and release the funds when faced with the same challenge. .
Crane and Matten (2010, p. 98) describe the utilitarianism theory as a consequentialist theory. They go on to show that as a consequentialist theory, utilitarianism is a theory used in the business context concerns itself with addressing issues of right and wrong, according to the outcomes of actions. .