Article Writing Homework Help

I need some assistance with these assignment. we should work with and study the ambiguities fluidity and openness of social life rather than try and repress these in a fruitless chase for experimental

I need some assistance with these assignment. we should work with and study the ambiguities fluidity and openness of social life rather than try and repress these in a fruitless chase for experimental control and scientific respectability (wetherall 1996) discuss Thank you in advance for the help! Psychology Research The society comprises of all types of people. A complete society has to contain different kinds of individuals. People should be ready to appreciate the behavior of others as everybody makes up the society. Appreciation of people’s behavior is very important as it creates a god understanding for a peaceful living in the society. People have different characters. This is because the environment, where a person grows up, partly contributed towards the behavior that one acquires. An individual cannot choose one’s birthplace since it comes due to the prevailing circumstances (Fisher 2005, p. 56). It is, therefore, wrong to blame somebody for acquiring a given culture of the environment in which one was raised.

Get Your Custom Essay Written From Scratch
We have worked on a similar problem. If you need help click order now button and submit your assignment instructions.
Just from $13/Page
Order Now

There are scientific theories that study human behavior. The theories come up with conclusions that summarize their findings. The scientists assume that the recommendations of the findings are the perfect ways in which people should live. It is important to note that scientific theories are not flexible as well as dynamic enough to be able to contain every aspect of the society. People end up struggling to meet the scientific requirements in order to live within the accepted code of ethics. This s referred to as living the life of others (Akerlof 2009, p. 89). Obviously, those who recommend particular behaviors only bring forward what fits them.

Field theories enable the understanding of human behavior. They study of continuous activities that encompass the human environment assist in getting the key facts of human behavior. Scientific theories do not promote status quo, as they do not account for every type of individual in the society. Furthermore, the theories do not promote social justice. It would be impossible to instill a behavior that does not already exist in a certain society. It amount to undermining the existing culture of that society.

People are not aware of the repercussions associated with conforming to scientific theories. It is very difficult to live by the lives of the scientists. Every society has its own values which it appreciates and expects people to live by. The values depend on the environment of the society and appreciate all the individuals in the particular society. Scientists come up with general theories on human behavior to change the existing norms. This can be said to be lack of respect for the norms of the society as the scientists only bring what favors them. In addition, there are deep reasons towards appreciation of a given norm by a particular society (Robbins 2001, p. 34). The reason can be beyond the understanding of behavior scientists working out general behavior formulas.

People differ in what they like doing and what they would love doing. Behavioral theories are what the scientists would prefer their life to be. I wonder if theorists declare their values or if they assume that, there life is value free. I value my culture and I do not believe in other people’s culture. I acquire my morals from my society in regard to what they appreciate as good conduct (Chelton and Cool 2009, p. 178). I do not understand how one can live within the norms of a different society different from where one is raised or lives. The scientific theories are not to the interests of my society but are to the interest of the representative society where the studies are taken.

ReferencesTop of Top of Top of Form

Top of Form

Top of Form

Top of Form

Top of Form

Top of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Akerlof, A., & Shiller, J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Chelton, K., & Cool, C. (2004). Youth information-seeking behavior: Theories, models, and issues. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

Fisher, E., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, L. (2005). Theories of information behavior. Medford, N.J: Published for the American Society for Information Science and Technology by Information Today.

Helfgott, B. (2008). Criminal behavior: Theories, typologies, and criminal justice. Los Angeles, LA: SAGE.

Inglis, F. (2004). Culture. Cambridge, PA: Polity.

Levinthal, F. (2002). Drugs, behavior, and modern society. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Myers, G. (2004). Psychology. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

OReilly, B. (2006). Culture warrior. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

Parhizgar, D. (2002). Multicultural behavior and global business environments. New York, N.Y: International Business Press.

Robbins, P. (2001). Organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.

Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (2000). Psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.