Law Homework Help
CRIJ 1306 Central Texas College Lesson 7 CH14 Lockyer Attorney General of California v Andrade Case Study
Chapter 13 – North Carolina v. Alford
Did Henry Alford knowingly and voluntarily plead guilty?
Consider the dissent’s comment that Henry Alford was “so gripped by fear of the death penalty” that his decision was “the product of duress.” Should defendants ever be allowed to plead guilty if they believe they’re innocent? Why or why not? Back up your answer with arguments from the majority and dissenting opinions.
Do Alford pleas promote the accuracy and sorting of criminal procedure.
- Chapter 14 – Lockyer, Attorney General of California v. Andrade
- Why does the majority believe that the three-strikes law isn’t cruel and unusual?
- Why does the dissent believe that it is cruel and unusual?
Are their opinions purely subjective, or are they based on some specific standards? If so,what are the standards?
Should the California legislature or the U.S. Supreme Court decide whether punishments are cruel and unusual? Explain your answer.
Do you believe 25 years to life is “grossly disproportionate” to Leandro Andrade’s crime? How do you know whether it is or isn’t?
