Law Homework Help

Write a 750- to 800-word Cybercrime Prevention Guide for an organization you select based on a cybercrime which may affect it. Include the following in the Cybercrime Prevention Guide:

• Provide a thorough analysis of how an organization can protect itself from this type of crime.
• Discuss preventative measures, including security precautions that could be put into place.

Prepare a 10- to 15-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation to accompany your Cybercrime Prevention Guide.

Format your paper and Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation consistent with APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment.

DQ-1

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: 

• What factors have hampered the ability of state and local law enforcement agencies to respond to the growing threat of computer crime? How are state and local law enforcement officers addressing this issue? What do you      recommend that these law enforcement officers and agencies do during the next 5 years to address this issue? 

Assignment Content

Review the information from the Cyberattack Scenario.

Create a 10- to 15-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation that includes a step-by-step restoration and recovery plan. This plan must create strategies to restore information-system operations in the event of an attack or failure.

Make sure to address the following points in the step-by-step plan:

• In relation to your position, identify the steps you would take to address how to recover data, secure the establishment, and investigate the crime.
• Include the strengths and weaknesses of contemporary methodologies and technologies designed to protect information systems and data as part of  your plan’s justification.

Format your Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation consistent with APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment.

DQ-2

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: 

What is the process used to preserve the verifiable integrity of digital evidence? How does this process ensure that data is preserved and is not modified? How might an analyst show that the original evidence

is unmodified? If you were serving on a jury, what arguments would convince you that evidence is not modified?